Using GitLab CI CD with a GitHub repository GitLab

gitlab ci cd vs github actions

When your workflow is triggered, a workflow run is created that executes the workflow. After a workflow run has started, you can see a visualization graph of the run’s progress and view each step’s activity on GitHub. You can configure a job’s dependencies with other jobs; by default, jobs have no dependencies and run in parallel with each other. When a job takes a dependency on another job, it will wait for the dependent job to complete before it can run. For example, you may have multiple build jobs for different architectures that have no dependencies, and a packaging job that is dependent on those jobs. The build jobs will run in parallel, and when they have all completed successfully, the packaging job will run.

GitLab CI/CD syntax for databases and service containers

Choosing a solution to create or improve your CI/CD pipeline may seem like a daunting task. Read on to learn more about the benefits and limitations of choosing CircleCI, Github Actions, and GitLab. This partnership between GitHub and JFrog enables developers to manage code and binaries more efficiently on two of the most widely used developer platforms in the world.

problems stacked diffs address

gitlab ci cd vs github actions

Users can customize the behavior of actions by passing input arguments to them. In addition to Bash and PowerShell, it is also possible to directly use Python, JavaScript and other interpreted languages. In addition to workflow control and job control, each step has an optional parameter to determine if the step should be executed. An action is a custom application for the GitHub Actions platform that performs a complex but frequently repeated task. Use an action to help reduce the amount of repetitive code that you write in your workflow files.

Additional Functionality & Services

GitHub Actions uses a different YAML syntax than GitLab CI/CD, and it may not support all of the features provided by GitLab CI/CD. Additionally, using GitHub Actions with GitLab CI YAML files may require additional configuration and maintenance. Compared with other automation or CI/CD tools, GitHub Actions offers native capabilities right in your GitHub flow. It also makes it easy to leverage any of the 10,000+ pre-written and tested automations and CI/CD actions in the GitHub Marketplace as well as the ability to write your own with easy-to-use YAML files. Enabling continuous testing in GitHub Actions works much the same way as in CircleCI, except that a prebuilt container is often used for testing purposes instead of an orb. In this case, you define the secrets used to access the container in question, then run the container with the appropriate flags and the location of the working directory where the application you want to test resides.

I have other repos which do execute on GitLab but are failing the validation. Their pipeline is also too big, so I think printing the full yaml directly to the console should be avoided. While CircleCI and GitHub Actions accomplish the same tasks, each service has a different feel and ethos. Both CircleCI and GitHub Actions are available as a self-hosted platform or as a SaaS product. I’ve used both, and, for my small-time programming purposes, they have worked extremely well.

  1. When your workflow is triggered, a workflow run is created that executes the workflow.
  2. This can help ensure consistency and reduce duplication of effort.
  3. GitLab provides a variety of security scannersout-of-the-box to detect vulnerabilities in all parts of the SLDC.
  4. GitLab itself also seems to allow for easier integration with third-party systems.
  5. Only the GitHub/GitLab instances has to be accessible by the runners, the runners themselves don’t need to be exposed to the internet.

gitlab ci cd vs github actions

GitLab is integrated tightly with Git,so SCM polling options for triggers are not needed, but can be configured per job if required. Many GitHub features and concepts have equivalents in GitLab that offer the samefunctionality. You can see that the repository is a solution to one of the problems in Codeforces, an online platform for competitive programming. GitLab CI/CD can be used with and GitHub Enterprise bycreating a CI/CD project to connect your GitHub repository toGitLab.

In GitLab the equivalent to an action wouldbe a the include keyword, which allows you to add CI/CD pipelines from other files,including template files built into GitLab. You can leverage its vast ecosystem of prebuilt actions (reusable code snippets) to automate most DevOps tasks. Want to automatically send notifications to your team on deployment success? In a similar fashion to code repository websites (like GitHub) there are some container repository websites (like DockerHub)where many software services have prebuilt images that one can easily deploy. Some IT organizations prefer GitHub Actions because it’s more tightly integrated with their code repositories on GitHub.

Environments can even be automatically removed after a certain time or after a pull request gets merged. Compared to GitHub, GitLab’s environments are definitely more advanced and versatile. For Kubernetes users, GitLab offers its optional GitLab Agent to access the insides of a cluster without any additional tokens. The agent gets deployed within a cluster and communicates with a GitLab instance, allowing it to be accessed via the CI. GitHub Actions and GitLab CI are two very powerful CI/CD systems that allow users to automate almost every imaginable task within the software development life cycle. At a functional level, both systems are on a similarly equal level, but the way they are implemented differs significantly.GitHub offers a stable, versatile and modular platform to run almost every kind of imaginable task.

This can help ensure consistency and reduce duplication of effort. However, GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD use different YAML syntax and have different features, making it challenging to centralize the configuration for both tools in a single repository. GitLab CI/CD extends the GitLab platform to allow developers to run continuous integration and delivery pipelines against their code repositories.

Security is a top concern in CI/CD, and both tools offer robust features for managing secrets and permissions. However, GitLab CI/CD’s protected variables, which are only exposed to protected branches and tags, provide an additional layer of security that can be particularly valuable in sensitive projects. Now, when we push any of the changes to the remote repository, we expect these pipelines to be run by a computing entity (which is called a runner in Gitlab’s/Github’s lingo). To solve this (especially in the context of teams) we have the concept of a cloud-based build system called continuous integration (CI). Teams may feel compelled to use one platform over the other based on their repository selection and perceived process compatibility.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply